more on church

first there was this, this, this, and this. through those, I came across all of the ones below. read them all.... http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/01/defining_the_em.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/01/more_on_megachu.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/02/emerging_church.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/02/emerging_church_1.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/02/emerging_church_2.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/02/emerging_church_3.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2004/02/emerging_church_4.html http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/church/index.html and then: http://bridgesbuilder.typepad.com/nw/what_is_the_church/index.html and: http://www.emergingchurchnetwork.com/wabisabi/ There is so much more out there, but this is a good start to hash through all of this stuff. If you're someone who likes to hash, that is. If you're not a hasher, please be respectful to everyone's opinions. This is not me saying "There's not One Right Answer." There may very well be One Right Answer. I'm just not sure what that is. IMO: Everyone who is a hasher, should also respect the people they are hashing, but not necessarily the opinions. The opinions are to be hashed through and you can't always keep every one of them in some sort of intellectual "everything is as good as everything else" suspension. One or a few have to rise to the top eventually--even if you come to the point of saying "This works for me but not everyone." Now I realize that 'hash' was probably the least appropriate word I could have used there. But after all the stupid HTML linking and coding, I ain't going back to fix it.